Suppose a compliance platform is priced at $12,000 per year. Does it cost a lot?
The answer will depend on the product it replaces.
If the automation process eliminates hundreds of hours repetitive evidence collection across a complicated technology environment, $12,000 could be well-spent. If a company of seven could collect the same information in only a few hours each month, the calculation is quite different.
It’s a smart way to approach the search for a Vanta alternative. Don’t start by asking which platform offers the most features. Ask what those features will save your company in actual time and work.
The Break-Even Level for Automation
It’s not inherently good or evil. Scale affects its value. Imagine a technology company that is growing, and has numerous cloud environments, numerous applications and frequent changes in access. The strain of manually gathering evidence on a regular basis could be very heavy. Integrations that monitor systems automatically and gather evidence can justly justify the expense.
Now consider a 10-person startup that is preparing for its initial SOC 2. The system may be compact, and evidence collection could remain manageable without massive automation.
This difference is important when evaluating Vanta’s pricing. A well-designed platform may offer substantial capabilities, but those capabilities will only be of value when the company actually needs them.
Compare Architecture and not just Brands
A search for Vanta vs Drata can quickly become a feature-by-feature exercise. The two platforms are built on automation and integrated and therefore, companies seeking this method can benefit from having a look at the frameworks available with their integrations, service, as well as individual quotations and contracts.
There’s a second decision that you must take. Do you require a software that can be integrated into your compliance system? Some companies prefer continuous monitoring as well as automated evidence collection and automated evidence gathering. Others prefer to provide their own evidence, especially when the workload is low.
Vanta Competitors Do not all follow the same model
A number of famous Vanta competitors compete in the same category of automation. There are other platforms which focus on organization and large system connectivity.
CertAssist is a part of this group. The product was created by compliance consultants as well as internal auditors, CertAssist organizes framework controls in a central workspace, provides editable policy as well as evidence-based guidance. It also permits auditors to look over evidence via the use of read-only access.
It does not install agents or connect to infrastructure systems. Customers can upload their own proof.
Be aware of the access to the system.
It is evident that the removal of integrations is a disadvantage. Someone has to gather evidence by hand.
This also means that integration setup is eliminated and this means that the compliance application does not require connection to the organisation’s operational environment.
Both architectures aren’t universally superior. Which one is appropriate for your business?
CertAssist is targeted at companies that comprise between five and 200 people and provides pricing information rather than having to have an in-person sales meeting. Its stated launch price is $225 per month, as opposed to the regular cost of $375 monthly.
Let Complexity Take Its Place
The requirements for a start-up that has 10 employees aren’t necessarily identical to those of an organization with 100 or 500 workers.
Although compliance is easy A lightweight platform could be a good idea. As the amount of systems, employees as well as frameworks and evidence demands increase, the economics could eventually favor greater automation. Let complexity play a role when you purchase compliance technology.
Don’t pay for fifty integrations simply because they look attractive in a chart of comparison. They are worth paying for to perform the tasks they automate is more expensive than manually performing them.